Skip to content
CyberAccord

Compliance

Compliance readiness and gap assessments

We find the gaps between where you are and what the framework requires, close them with you, and get you ready for the auditor.

At a glance

CyberAccord prepares organizations for security and privacy frameworks including SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, NIST CSF and SP 800-171, GDPR and CCPA, NYDFS Part 500, the FTC Safeguards Rule and the EU AI Act. We run the gap assessment, build the remediation plan and documentation, and support you through the independent audit.

Frameworks

Frameworks we prepare you for

Security frameworks

Control frameworks customers, auditors and contracts ask for.

Privacy and sector rules

Laws and regulations tied to the data you hold or the sector you work in.

Readiness

How readiness works

  1. 1

    Gap assessment

    We compare your current controls, policies and evidence against the framework and rank what's missing by risk and effort.

  2. 2

    Remediation plan

    A prioritized, owner-assigned plan your team can execute, with the policies and procedures written for you.

  3. 3

    Evidence and readiness

    We help implement controls, collect evidence and run a readiness review so there are no surprises.

  4. 4

    Audit support

    We stay with you through the independent audit or certification and answer the auditor's follow-up questions.

Crosswalk

One control set, several frameworks

Most security frameworks ask for the same control domains under different clause numbers, so one well-documented program can serve several audits.

Control domains mapped across frameworks
Control domainSOC 2Trust Services CriteriaISO 27001ISO/IEC 27001:2022PCI DSSv4.0.1NIST CSFCSF 2.0HIPAA45 CFR 164 Subpart CNYDFS 50023 NYCRR 500FTC Safeguards16 CFR 314
Access controlCC6.1–CC6.3A.5.15, A.5.18, A.8.5Req. 7, Req. 8PR.AA164.308(a)(4), 164.312(a)(1), 164.312(d)500.7, 500.12314.4(c)(1), (c)(5)
Logging and monitoringCC7.2A.8.15, A.8.16Req. 10DE.CM, DE.AE164.308(a)(1)(ii)(D), 164.312(b)500.6, 500.14(a)(1)314.4(c)(8)
Incident responseCC7.3–CC7.5A.5.24–A.5.2812.10RS.MA, RS.AN, RS.CO, RS.MI, RC.RP164.308(a)(6)500.16, 500.17314.4(h), (j)
Vendor and third-party riskCC9.2A.5.19–A.5.2212.8GV.SC164.308(b)(1), 164.314(a)500.11314.4(f)
Risk assessmentCC3.1–CC3.4Clauses 6.1.2, 8.212.3 (targeted risk analysis)ID.RA164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A)–(B)500.9314.4(b)
Encryption and data protectionCC6.1, CC6.7A.8.24Req. 3, Req. 4PR.DS164.312(a)(2)(iv), 164.312(e)(1)500.15314.4(c)(3)
Change managementCC8.1A.8.326.5ID.RA-07, PR.PS-01No specific provisionNo specific provision314.4(c)(7)
Security awareness trainingCC2.2A.6.312.6PR.AT164.308(a)(5)500.14(a)(3)314.4(e)

Domain-level mapping for orientation, not a control-by-control equivalence; an auditor or assessor decides whether evidence satisfies a specific requirement. A dash means the framework has no explicit provision for that domain.

Sources: AICPA Trust Services Criteria; NIST mapping of ISO/IEC 27001:2022 to CSF 2.0; PCI SSC document library; NIST CSF 2.0; 45 CFR Part 164 Subpart C; 23 NYCRR Part 500; 16 CFR 314.4.

Have an audit or questionnaire coming up?

Tell us the framework and the deadline. We'll scope a gap assessment with a fixed quote.