Skip to content
CyberAccord

Insights

Security and compliance insights

Practical guides, explainers and regulatory updates on compliance frameworks, security testing and AI risk, written by the CyberAccord Security Team.

Latest · Explainer

Both reports are issued by an independent CPA firm against the same AICPA criteria. The difference is time: one date versus a period of evidence.

By CyberAccord Security TeamPublished 6 min read
Read the explainer

Key takeaways

  • A Type I report covers control design at a point in time; a Type II report adds testing of operating effectiveness over a period.
  • Only a licensed CPA firm can issue a SOC 2 report, under the AICPA attestation standards and SOC 2 guide.
  • A Type I makes sense for a first report or a near-term customer deadline; plan the Type II period to start soon after.
  • Buyers read the period dates, scope, exceptions, user entity responsibilities and subservice organizations, not just the opinion.
  • A bridge letter covers the gap between the end of the last report period and today; it is not a new audit opinion.

Stay current

Follow CyberAccord on LinkedIn

We post new articles and regulatory changes there as they are published.

Follow on LinkedIn

Prefer a feed reader? Subscribe to the RSS feed.

Talk to a security practitioner

Book a free 20-minute consultation. We'll learn what's driving the need and recommend a scoped next step with a fixed quote.